abs
is
bound to (a location initially containing) a procedure of one argument
that computes the absolute value of a number, and the variable +
is bound to a procedure that computes sums.
The standard boolean objects for true and false are written as
#t and #f.
What really matters, though, are the objects that the Scheme conditional
expressions (if, cond, and, or, do)
treat as true or false.
The phrase "a true value" (or sometimes just "true") means any
object treated as true by the conditional expressions, and the phrase
"a false value" (or "false") means any object treated as false by
the conditional expressions.
Of all the standard Scheme values, only #f
counts as false in conditional expressions.
Except for #f,
all standard Scheme values, including #t,
pairs, the empty list, symbols, numbers, strings, vectors, and procedures,
count as true.
Note: In some implementations the empty list counts as false, contrary to the above. Nonetheless a few examples in this report assume that the empty list counts as true, as in [IEEESCHEME].
Note: Programmers accustomed to other dialects of Lisp should be aware that
Scheme distinguishes both #f and the empty list from the symbol
nil.
Boolean constants evaluate to themselves, so they don't need to be quoted in programs.
#t => #t #f => #f '#f => #f
Not returns #t if obj is false, and returns
#f otherwise.
(not #t) => #f (not 3) => #f (not (list 3)) => #f (not #f) => #t (not '()) => #f (not (list)) => #f (not 'nil) => #f
essential procedure: boolean? obj
Boolean? returns #t if obj is either #t or
#f and returns #f otherwise.
(boolean? #f) => #t (boolean? 0) => #f (boolean? '()) => #f
A predicate is a procedure that always returns a boolean
value (#t or #f). An equivalence predicate is
the computational analogue of a mathematical equivalence relation (it is
symmetric, reflexive, and transitive). Of the equivalence predicates
described in this section, eq? is the finest or most
discriminating, and equal? is the coarsest. Eqv? is
slightly less discriminating than eq?.
essential procedure: eqv? obj1 obj2
The eqv? procedure defines a useful equivalence relation on
objects.
Briefly, it returns #t if obj1 and obj2 should
normally be regarded as the same object. This relation is left slightly
open to interpretation, but the following partial specification of
eqv? holds for all implementations of Scheme.
The eqv? procedure returns #t if:
#t or both #f.
(string=? (symbol->string obj1)
(symbol->string obj2))
=> #t
Note: This assumes that neither obj1 nor obj2 is an “uninterned
symbol” as alluded to in section Symbols. This report does
not presume to specify the behavior of eqv? on
implementation-dependent
extensions.
=, section Numbers), and are either both
exact or both inexact.
char=? procedure (section Characters).
The eqv? procedure returns #f if:
#t but the other is
#f.
(string=? (symbol->string obj1)
(symbol->string obj2))
=> #f
=
procedure returns #f.
char=?
procedure returns #f.
(eqv? 'a 'a) => #t
(eqv? 'a 'b) => #f
(eqv? 2 2) => #t
(eqv? '() '()) => #t
(eqv? 100000000 100000000) => #t
(eqv? (cons 1 2) (cons 1 2))=> #f
(eqv? (lambda () 1)
(lambda () 2)) => #f
(eqv? #f 'nil) => #f
(let ((p (lambda (x) x)))
(eqv? p p)) => #t
The following examples illustrate cases in which the above rules do
not fully specify the behavior of eqv?. All that can be said
about such cases is that the value returned by eqv? must be a
boolean.
(eqv? "" "") => unspecified
(eqv? '#() '#()) => unspecified
(eqv? (lambda (x) x)
(lambda (x) x)) => unspecified
(eqv? (lambda (x) x)
(lambda (y) y)) => unspecified
The next set of examples shows the use of eqv? with procedures
that have local state. Gen-counter must return a distinct
procedure every time, since each procedure has its own internal counter.
Gen-loser, however, returns equivalent procedures each time,
since
the local state does not affect the value or side effects of the
procedures.
(define gen-counter
(lambda ()
(let ((n 0))
(lambda () (set! n (+ n 1)) n))))
(let ((g (gen-counter)))
(eqv? g g)) => #t
(eqv? (gen-counter) (gen-counter))
=> #f
(define gen-loser
(lambda ()
(let ((n 0))
(lambda () (set! n (+ n 1)) 27))))
(let ((g (gen-loser)))
(eqv? g g)) => #t
(eqv? (gen-loser) (gen-loser))
=> unspecified
(letrec ((f (lambda () (if (eqv? f g) 'both 'f)))
(g (lambda () (if (eqv? f g) 'both 'g)))
(eqv? f g))
=> unspecified
(letrec ((f (lambda () (if (eqv? f g) 'f 'both)))
(g (lambda () (if (eqv? f g) 'g 'both)))
(eqv? f g))
=> #f
Since it is an error to modify constant objects (those returned by
literal expressions), implementations are permitted, though not
required, to share structure between constants where appropriate. Thus
the value of eqv? on constants is sometimes
implementation-dependent.
(eqv? '(a) '(a)) => unspecified (eqv? "a" "a") => unspecified (eqv? '(b) (cdr '(a b))) => unspecified (let ((x '(a))) (eqv? x x)) => #t
Rationale: The above definition of eqv? allows implementations latitude in
their treatment of procedures and literals: implementations are free
either to detect or to fail to detect that two procedures or two literals
are equivalent to each other, and can decide whether or not to
merge representations of equivalent objects by using the same pointer or
bit pattern to represent both.
essential procedure: eq? obj1 obj2
Eq? is similar to eqv? except that in some cases it
is
capable of discerning distinctions finer than those detectable by
eqv?.
Eq? and eqv? are guaranteed to have the same
behavior on symbols, booleans, the empty list, pairs, and non-empty
strings and vectors. Eq?'s behavior on numbers and characters is
implementation-dependent, but it will always return either true or
false, and will return true only when eqv? would also return
true. Eq? may also behave differently from eqv? on
empty
vectors and empty strings.
(eq? 'a 'a) => #t (eq? '(a) '(a)) => unspecified (eq? (list 'a) (list 'a)) => #f (eq? "a" "a") => unspecified (eq? "" "") => unspecified (eq? '() '()) => #t (eq? 2 2) => unspecified (eq? #\A #\A) => unspecified (eq? car car) => #t (let ((n (+ 2 3))) (eq? n n)) => unspecified (let ((x '(a))) (eq? x x)) => #t (let ((x '#())) (eq? x x)) => #t (let ((p (lambda (x) x))) (eq? p p)) => #t
Rationale: It will usually be possible to implement eq?
much
more efficiently than eqv?, for example, as a simple pointer
comparison instead of as some more complicated operation. One reason is
that it may not be possible to compute eqv? of two numbers in
constant time, whereas eq? implemented as pointer comparison
will
always finish in constant time. Eq? may be used like eqv?
in applications using procedures to implement objects with state since
it obeys the same constraints as eqv?.
essential procedure: equal? obj1 obj2
Equal? recursively compares the contents of pairs, vectors, and
strings, applying eqv? on other objects such as numbers and
symbols.
A rule of thumb is that objects are generally equal? if they
print
the same. Equal? may fail to terminate if its arguments are
circular data structures.
(equal? 'a 'a) => #t
(equal? '(a) '(a)) => #t
(equal? '(a (b) c)
'(a (b) c)) => #t
(equal? "abc" "abc") => #t
(equal? 2 2) => #t
(equal? (make-vector 5 'a)
(make-vector 5 'a)) => #t
(equal? (lambda (x) x)
(lambda (y) y)) => unspecified
A pair (sometimes called a dotted pair) is a
record structure with two fields called the car and cdr fields (for
historical reasons). Pairs are created by the procedure cons.
The car and cdr fields are accessed by the procedures car and
cdr. The car and cdr fields are assigned by the procedures
set-car! and set-cdr!.
Pairs are used primarily to represent lists. A list can be defined recursively as either the empty list or a pair whose cdr is a list. More precisely, the set of lists is defined as the smallest set X such that
The objects in the car fields of successive pairs of a list are the elements of the list. For example, a two-element list is a pair whose car is the first element and whose cdr is a pair whose car is the second element and whose cdr is the empty list. The length of a list is the number of elements, which is the same as the number of pairs.
The empty list is a special object of its own type (it is not a pair); it has no elements and its length is zero.
Note: The above definitions imply that all lists have finite length and are terminated by the empty list.
The most general notation (external representation) for Scheme pairs is
the "dotted" notation (c1 . c2) where
c1 is the value of the car field and c2 is the value of the
cdr field. For example (4 . 5) is a pair whose car is 4
and whose cdr is 5. Note that (4 . 5) is the external
representation of a pair, not an expression that evaluates to a pair.
A more streamlined notation can be used for lists: the elements of the
list are simply enclosed in parentheses and separated by spaces. The
empty list
is written (). For example,
(a b c d e)
and
(a . (b . (c . (d . (e . ())))))
are equivalent notations for a list of symbols.
A chain of pairs not ending in the empty list is called an improper list. Note that an improper list is not a list. The list and dotted notations can be combined to represent improper lists:
(a b c . d)
is equivalent to
(a . (b . (c . d)))
Whether a given pair is a list depends upon what is stored in the cdr
field. When the set-cdr! procedure is used, an object can be a
list one moment and not the next:
(define x (list 'a 'b 'c)) (define y x) y => (a b c) (list? y) => #t (set-cdr! x 4) => unspecified x => (a . 4) (eqv? x y) => #t y => (a . 4) (list? y) => #f (set-cdr! x x) => unspecified (list? x) => #f
Within literal expressions and representations of objects read by the
read procedure, the forms '<datum>,`<datum>,
,<datum>, and ,@<datum> denote two-element lists
whose first elements are the symbols quote, quasiquote,
unquote, and
unquote-splicing, respectively. The second element in each case
is <datum>. This convention is supported so that arbitrary Scheme
programs may be represented as lists.
That is, according to Scheme's grammar, every
<expression> is also a <datum> (see section External representations).
Among other things, this permits the use of the read procedure to
parse Scheme programs. See section External representations.
essential procedure: pair? obj
Pair? returns #t if obj is a pair, and otherwise
returns #f.
(pair? '(a . b)) => #t (pair? '(a b c)) => #t (pair? '()) => #f (pair? '#(a b)) => #f
essential procedure: cons obj1 obj2
Returns a newly allocated pair whose car is obj1 and whose cdr is
obj2. The pair is guaranteed to be different (in the sense of
eqv?) from every existing object.
(cons 'a '()) => (a)
(cons '(a) '(b c d)) => ((a) b c d)
(cons "a" '(b c)) => ("a" b c)
(cons 'a 3) => (a . 3)
(cons '(a b) 'c) => ((a b) . c)
Returns the contents of the car field of pair. Note that it is an error to take the car of the empty list.
(car '(a b c)) => a (car '((a) b c d)) => (a) (car '(1 . 2)) => 1 (car '()) => error
Returns the contents of the cdr field of pair. Note that it is an error to take the cdr of the empty list.
(cdr '((a) b c d)) => (b c d) (cdr '(1 . 2)) => 2 (cdr '()) => error
essential procedure: set-car! pair obj
Stores obj in the car field of pair.
The value returned by set-car! is unspecified.
(define (f) (list 'not-a-constant-list)) (define (g) '(constant-list)) (set-car! (f) 3) => unspecified (set-car! (g) 3) => error
essential procedure: set-cdr! pair obj
Stores obj in the cdr field of pair.
The value returned by set-cdr! is unspecified.
essential procedure: caar pair
essential procedure: cadr pair
...
essential procedure: cdddar pair
essential procedure: cddddr pair
These procedures are compositions of car and cdr, where
for example caddr could be defined by
(define caddr (lambda (x) (car (cdr (cdr x))))).
Arbitrary compositions, up to four deep, are provided. There are twenty-eight of these procedures in all.
essential procedure: null? obj
Returns #t if obj is the empty list, otherwise returns
#f.
essential procedure: list? obj
Returns #t if obj is a list, otherwise returns #f.
By definition, all lists have finite length and are terminated by
the empty list.
(list? '(a b c)) => #t
(list? '()) => #t
(list? '(a . b)) => #f
(let ((x (list 'a)))
(set-cdr! x x)
(list? x)) => #f
essential procedure: list obj ...
Returns a newly allocated list of its arguments.
(list 'a (+ 3 4) 'c) => (a 7 c) (list) => ()
essential procedure: length list
Returns the length of list.
(length '(a b c)) => 3 (length '(a (b) (c d e))) => 3 (length '()) => 0
essential procedure: append list ...
Returns a list consisting of the elements of the first list followed by the elements of the other lists.
(append '(x) '(y)) => (x y) (append '(a) '(b c d)) => (a b c d) (append '(a (b)) '((c))) => (a (b) (c))
The resulting list is always newly allocated, except that it shares structure with the last list argument. The last argument may actually be any object; an improper list results if the last argument is not a proper list.
(append '(a b) '(c . d)) => (a b c . d) (append '() 'a) => a
essential procedure: reverse list
Returns a newly allocated list consisting of the elements of list in reverse order.
(reverse '(a b c)) => (c b a)
(reverse '(a (b c) d (e (f))))
=> ((e (f)) d (b c) a)
Returns the sublist of list obtained by omitting the first k
elements.
List-tail could be defined by
(define list-tail
(lambda (x k)
(if (zero? k)
x
(list-tail (cdr x) (- k 1)))))
essential procedure: list-ref list k
Returns the kth element of list. (This is the same
as the car of (list-tail list k).)
(list-ref '(a b c d) 2) => c
(list-ref '(a b c d)
(inexact->exact (round 1.8)))
=> c
essential procedure: memq obj list
essential procedure: memv obj list
essential procedure: member obj list
These procedures return the first sublist of list whose car is
obj, where the sublists of list are the non-empty lists
returned by (list-tail list k) for k less
than the length of list. If
obj does not occur in list, then #f (not the empty list) is
returned. Memq uses eq? to compare obj with the
elements of
list, while memv uses eqv? and member
uses equal?.
(memq 'a '(a b c)) => (a b c)
(memq 'b '(a b c)) => (b c)
(memq 'a '(b c d)) => #f
(memq (list 'a) '(b (a) c)) => #f
(member (list 'a)
'(b (a) c)) => ((a) c)
(memq 101 '(100 101 102)) => unspecified
(memv 101 '(100 101 102)) => (101 102)
essential procedure: assq obj alist
essential procedure: assv obj alist
essential procedure: assoc obj alist
Alist (for "association list") must be a list of pairs. These
procedures find the first pair in alist whose car field is
obj, and returns that pair. If no pair in alist has
obj as its car, then #f (not the empty list) is returned.
Assq uses eq? to compare obj with the car fields of
the pairs in alist, while assv uses eqv? and
assoc uses equal?.
(define e '((a 1) (b 2) (c 3)))
(assq 'a e) => (a 1)
(assq 'b e) => (b 2)
(assq 'd e) => #f
(assq (list 'a) '(((a)) ((b)) ((c))))
=> #f
(assoc (list 'a) '(((a)) ((b)) ((c))))
=> ((a))
(assq 5 '((2 3) (5 7) (11 13)))
=> unspecified
(assv 5 '((2 3) (5 7) (11 13)))
=> (5 7)
Rationale: Although they are ordinarily used as predicates,
memq, memv, member, assq, assv, and
symbolsassoc do not
have question marks in their names because they return useful values
rather than just #t or #f.
Symbols are objects whose usefulness rests on the fact that two symbols
are identical (in the sense of eqv?) if and only if their
names are spelled the same way. This is exactly the property needed to
represent identifiers
in programs, and so most implementations of Scheme use them internally
for that purpose. Symbols are useful for many other applications; for
instance, they may be used the way enumerated values are used in Pascal.
The rules for writing a symbol are exactly the same as the rules for writing an identifier; see section Identifiers and section Lexical structure.
It is guaranteed that any symbol that has been returned as part of
a literal expression, or read using the read procedure, and
subsequently written out using the write procedure, will read
back
in as the identical symbol (in the sense of eqv?). The
string->symbol procedure, however, can create symbols for
which this write/read invariance may not hold because their names
contain special characters or letters in the non-standard case.
Note: Some implementations of Scheme have a feature known as "slashification" in order to guarantee write/read invariance for all symbols, but historically the most important use of this feature has been to compensate for the lack of a string data type.
Some implementations also have "uninterned symbols", which defeat write/read invariance even in implementations with slashification, and also generate exceptions to the rule that two symbols are the same if and only if their names are spelled the same.
essential procedure: symbol? obj
Returns #t if obj is a symbol, otherwise returns #f.
(symbol? 'foo) => #t (symbol? (car '(a b))) => #t (symbol? "bar") => #f (symbol? 'nil) => #t (symbol? '()) => #f (symbol? #f) => #f
essential procedure: symbol->string symbol
Returns the name of symbol as a string. If the symbol was part of
an object returned as the value of a literal expression
(section Literal expressions) or by a call to the read
procedure,
and its name contains alphabetic characters, then the string returned
will contain characters in the implementation's preferred standard
case--some implementations will prefer upper case, others lower case.
If the symbol was returned by string->symbol, the case of
characters in the string returned will be the same as the case in the
string that was passed to string->symbol. It is an error
to apply mutation procedures like string-set! to strings returned
by this procedure.
The following examples assume that the implementation's standard case is lower case:
(symbol->string 'flying-fish)
=> "flying-fish"
(symbol->string 'Martin) => "martin"
(symbol->string
(string->symbol "Malvina"))
=> "Malvina"
essential procedure: string->symbol string
Returns the symbol whose name is string. This procedure can
create symbols with names containing special characters or letters in
the non-standard case, but it is usually a bad idea to create such
symbols because in some implementations of Scheme they cannot be read as
themselves. See symbol->string.
The following examples assume that the implementation's standard case is lower case:
(eq? 'mISSISSIppi 'mississippi)
=> #t
(string->symbol "mISSISSIppi")
=> the symbol with name "mISSISSIppi"
(eq? 'bitBlt (string->symbol "bitBlt"))
=> #f
(eq? 'JollyWog
(string->symbol
(symbol->string 'JollyWog)))
=> #t
(string=? "K. Harper, M.D."
(symbol->string
(string->symbol "K. Harper, M.D.")))
=> #t
It is important to distinguish between the mathematical numbers, the Scheme numbers that attempt to model them, the machine representations used to implement the Scheme numbers, and notations used to write numbers. This report uses the types number, complex, real, rational, and integer to refer to both mathematical numbers and Scheme numbers. Machine representations such as fixed point and floating point are referred to by names such as fixnum and flonum.
For example, 3 is an integer. Therefore 3 is also a rational,
a real, and a complex. The same is true of the Scheme numbers
that model 3. For Scheme numbers, these types are defined by the
predicates number?, complex?, real?,
rational?, and integer?.
There is no simple relationship between a number's type and its representation inside a computer. Although most implementations of Scheme will offer at least two different representations of 3, these different representations denote the same integer.
Scheme's numerical operations treat numbers as abstract data, as independent of their representation as possible. Although an implementation of Scheme may use fixnum, flonum, and perhaps other representations for numbers, this should not be apparent to a casual programmer writing simple programs.
It is necessary, however, to distinguish between numbers that are represented exactly and those that may not be. For example, indexes into data structures must be known exactly, as must some polynomial coefficients in a symbolic algebra system. On the other hand, the results of measurements are inherently inexact, and irrational numbers may be approximated by rational and therefore inexact approximations. In order to catch uses of inexact numbers where exact numbers are required, Scheme explicitly distinguishes exact from inexact numbers. This distinction is orthogonal to the dimension of type.
Scheme numbers are either exact or inexact. A number is exact if it was written as an exact constant or was derived from exact numbers using only exact operations. A number is inexact if it was written as an inexact constant, if it was derived using inexact ingredients, or if it was derived using inexact operations. Thus inexactness is a contagious property of a number.
If two implementations produce exact results for a computation that did not involve inexact intermediate results, the two ultimate results will be mathematically equivalent. This is generally not true of computations involving inexact numbers since approximate methods such as floating point arithmetic may be used, but it is the duty of each implementation to make the result as close as practical to the mathematically ideal result.
Rational operations such as + should always produce
exact results when given exact arguments.
If the operation is unable to produce an exact result,
then it may either report the violation of an implementation restriction
or it may silently coerce its
result to an inexact value.
See section Implementation restrictions.
With the exception of inexact->exact, the operations described in
this section must generally return inexact results when given any inexact
arguments. An operation may, however, return an exact result if it can
prove that the value of the result is unaffected by the inexactness of its
arguments. For example, multiplication of any number by an exact zero
may produce an exact zero result, even if the other argument is
inexact.
Implementations may also support only a limited range of numbers of any type, subject to the requirements of this section. The supported range for exact numbers of any type may be different from the supported range for inexact numbers of that type. For example, an implementation that uses flonums to represent all its inexact real numbers may support a practically unbounded range of exact integers and rationals while limiting the range of inexact reals (and therefore the range of inexact integers and rationals) to the dynamic range of the flonum format. Furthermore the gaps between the representable inexact integers and rationals are likely to be very large in such an implementation as the limits of this range are approached.
An implementation of Scheme must support exact integers
throughout the range of numbers that may be used for indexes of
lists, vectors, and strings or that may result from computing the length of a
list, vector, or string. The length, vector-length,
and string-length procedures must return an exact
integer, and it is an error to use anything but an exact integer as an
index. Furthermore any integer constant within the index range, if
expressed by an exact integer syntax, will indeed be read as an exact
integer, regardless of any implementation restrictions that may apply
outside this range. Finally, the procedures listed below will always
return an exact integer result provided all their arguments are exact integers
and the mathematically expected result is representable as an exact integer
within the implementation:
+ - * quotient remainder modulo max min abs numerator denominator gcd lcm floor ceiling truncate round rationalize expt
Implementations are encouraged, but not required, to support
exact integers and exact rationals of
practically unlimited size and precision, and to implement the
above procedures and the / procedure in
such a way that they always return exact results when given exact
arguments. If one of these procedures is unable to deliver an exact
result when given exact arguments, then it may either report a
violation of an
implementation restriction or it may silently coerce its result to an
inexact number. Such a coercion may cause an error later.
An implementation may use floating point and other approximate representation strategies for inexact numbers.
This report recommends, but does not require, that the IEEE 32-bit and 64-bit floating point standards be followed by implementations that use flonum representations, and that implementations using other representations should match or exceed the precision achievable using these floating point standards [IEEE].
In particular, implementations that use flonum representations
must follow these rules: A flonum result
must be represented with at least as much precision as is used to express any of
the inexact arguments to that operation. It is desirable (but not required) for
potentially inexact operations such as sqrt, when applied to
exact
arguments, to produce exact answers whenever possible (for example the
square root of an exact 4 ought to be an exact 2).
If, however, an
exact number is operated upon so as to produce an inexact result
(as by sqrt), and if the result is represented as a
flonum, then
the most precise flonum format available must be used; but if the result
is represented in some other way then the representation must have at least as
much precision as the most precise flonum format available.
Although Scheme allows a variety of written notations for numbers, any particular implementation may support only some of them. For example, an implementation in which all numbers are real need not support the rectangular and polar notations for complex numbers. If an implementation encounters an exact numerical constant that it cannot represent as an exact number, then it may either report a violation of an implementation restriction or it may silently represent the constant by an inexact number.
The syntax of the written representations for numbers is described formally in section Lexical structure.
A number may be written in binary, octal, decimal, or
hexadecimal by the use of a radix prefix. The radix prefixes are
#b (binary),
#o (octal),
#d (decimal), and
#x (hexadecimal).
With no radix prefix, a number is assumed to be expressed in decimal.
A
numerical constant may be specified to be either exact or
inexact by a prefix. The prefixes are #e
for exact, and #i
for inexact. An exactness
prefix may appear before or after any radix prefix that is used. If
the written representation of a number has no exactness prefix, the
constant may be either inexact or exact. It is
inexact if it contains a decimal point, an
exponent, or a "#" character in the place of a digit,
otherwise it is exact.
In systems with inexact numbers
of varying precisions it may be useful to specify
the precision of a constant. For this purpose, numerical constants
may be written with an exponent marker that indicates the
desired precision of the inexact
representation. The letters s, f,
d, and l specify the use of short, single,
double, and long precision, respectively. (When fewer
than four internal
inexact
representations exist, the four size
specifications are mapped onto those available. For example, an
implementation with two internal representations may map short and
single together and long and double together.) In addition, the
exponent marker e specifies the default precision for the
implementation. The default precision has at least as much precision
as double, but
implementations may wish to allow this default to be set by the user.
3.14159265358979F0
Round to single --- 3.141593
0.6L0
Extend to long --- .600000000000000
The reader is referred to section Entry format for a summary of the naming conventions used to specify restrictions on the types of arguments to numerical routines.
The examples used in this section assume that any numerical constant written using an exact notation is indeed represented as an exact number. Some examples also assume that certain numerical constants written using an inexact notation can be represented without loss of accuracy; the inexact constants were chosen so that this is likely to be true in implementations that use flonums to represent inexact numbers.
essential procedure: number? obj
essential procedure: complex? obj
essential procedure: real? obj
essential procedure: rational? obj
essential procedure: integer? obj
These numerical type predicates can be applied to any kind of
argument, including non-numbers. They return #t if the object is
of the named type, and otherwise they return #f.
In general, if a type predicate is true of a number then all higher
type predicates are also true of that number. Consequently, if a type
predicate is false of a number, then all lower type predicates are
also false of that number.
If z is an inexact complex number, then (real? z) is true if
and only if (zero? (imag-part z)) is true. If x is an inexact
real number, then (integer? x) is true if and only if
(= x (round x)).
(complex? 3+4i) => #t (complex? 3) => #t (real? 3) => #t (real? -2.5+0.0i) => #t (real? #e1e10) => #t (rational? 6/10) => #t (rational? 6/3) => #t (integer? 3+0i) => #t (integer? 3.0) => #t (integer? 8/4) => #t
Note: The behavior of these type predicates on inexact numbers is unreliable, since any inaccuracy may affect the result.
Note: In many implementations the rational? procedure will be the same
as real?, and the complex? procedure will be the same
as
number?, but unusual implementations may be able to represent
some irrational numbers exactly or may extend the number system to
support some kind of non-complex numbers.
essential procedure: inexact? z
These numerical predicates provide tests for the exactness of a quantity. For any Scheme number, precisely one of these predicates is true.
essential procedure: = z1 z2 z3 ...
essential procedure: < x1 x2 x3 ...
essential procedure: > x1 x2 x3 ...
essential procedure: <= x1 x2 x3 ...
essential procedure: >= x1 x2 x3 ...
These procedures return #t if their arguments are (respectively):
equal, monotonically increasing, monotonically decreasing,
monotonically nondecreasing, or monotonically nonincreasing.
These predicates are required to be transitive.
Note: The traditional implementations of these predicates in Lisp-like languages are not transitive.
Note: While it is not an error to compare inexact numbers using these
predicates, the results may be unreliable because a small inaccuracy
may affect the result; this is especially true of = and zero?.
When in doubt, consult a numerical analyst.
essential procedure: positive? x
essential procedure: negative? x
These numerical predicates test a number for a particular property,
returning #t or #f. See note above.
essential procedure: max x1 x2 ...
essential procedure: min x1 x2 ...
These procedures return the maximum or minimum of their arguments.
(max 3 4) => 4 ; exact (max 3.9 4) => 4.0 ; inexact
Note: If any argument is inexact, then the result will also be inexact (unless
the procedure can prove that the inaccuracy is not large enough to affect the
result, which is possible only in unusual implementations). If
min or
max is used to compare numbers of mixed exactness, and the
numerical
value of the result cannot be represented as an inexact number without loss of
accuracy, then the procedure may report a violation of an implementation
restriction.
These procedures return the sum or product of their arguments.
(+ 3 4) => 7 (+ 3) => 3 (+) => 0 (* 4) => 4 (*) => 1
With two or more arguments, these procedures return the difference or quotient of their arguments, associating to the left. With one argument, however, they return the additive or multiplicative inverse of their argument.
(- 3 4) => -1 (- 3 4 5) => -6 (- 3) => -3 (/ 3 4 5) => 3/20 (/ 3) => 1/3
Abs returns the magnitude of its argument.
(abs -7) => 7
essential procedure: quotient n1 n2
essential procedure: remainder n1 n2
essential procedure: modulo n1 n2
These procedures implement number-theoretic (integer) division: For positive integers n1 and n2, if n3 and n4 are integers such that
(= n1 (+ (* n2 n3) n4)),
(<= 0 n4), and
(< n4 n2).
(quotient n1 n2) => n3 (remainder n1 n2) => n4 (modulo n1 n2) => n4
For integers n1 and n2 with n2 not equal to 0,
(= n1 (+ (* n2 (quotient n1 n2))
(remainder n1 n2)))
=> #t
provided all numbers involved in that computation are exact.
The value returned by quotient always has the sign of the
product of its arguments. Remainder and modulo differ
on negative
arguments--the
remainder is either zero or has the sign of the dividend,
while the modulo
always has the sign of the divisor:
(modulo 13 4) => 1 (remainder 13 4) => 1
(modulo -13 4) => 3 (remainder -13 4) => -1
(modulo 13 -4) => -3 (remainder 13 -4) => 1
(modulo -13 -4) => -1 (remainder -13 -4) => -1
(remainder -13 -4.0) => -1.0 ; inexact
essential procedure: gcd n1 ...
essential procedure: lcm n1 ...
These procedures return the greatest common divisor or least common multiple of their arguments. The result is always non-negative.
(gcd 32 -36) => 4 (gcd) => 0 (lcm 32 -36) => 288 (lcm 32.0 -36) => 288.0 ; inexact (lcm) => 1
These procedures return the numerator or denominator of their argument; the result is computed as if the argument was represented as a fraction in lowest terms. The denominator is always positive. The denominator of 0 is defined to be 1.
(numerator (/ 6 4)) => 3 (denominator (/ 6 4)) => 2 (denominator (exact->inexact (/ 6 4))) => 2.0
essential procedure: ceiling x
essential procedure: truncate x
These procedures return integers.
Floor returns the largest integer not larger than x.
Ceiling returns the smallest integer not smaller than x.
Truncate returns the integer closest to x whose absolute
value is not larger than the absolute value of x. Round
returns the
closest integer to x, rounding to even when x is halfway between two
integers.
Rationale: Round rounds to even for consistency with the default rounding
mode specified by the IEEE floating point standard.
Note: If the argument to one of these procedures is inexact, then the result
will also be inexact. If an exact value is needed, the
result should be passed to the inexact->exact procedure.
(floor -4.3) => -5.0 (ceiling -4.3) => -4.0 (truncate -4.3) => -4.0 (round -4.3) => -4.0
(floor 3.5) => 3.0 (ceiling 3.5) => 4.0 (truncate 3.5) => 3.0 (round 3.5) => 4.0 ; inexact
(round 7/2) => 4 ; exact (round 7) => 7
Rationalize returns the simplest rational number
differing from x by no more than y. A rational number
r1 is simpler than another rational number r2 if
(= r1 (/ p1 q1)) and
(= r2 (/ p2 q2)) (in lowest terms) and
(<= (abs p1) (abs p2)) and
(<= (abs q1) (abs q2)).
(3/5) is simpler than (4/7). Although not all
rationals are comparable in this ordering (consider (2/7) and
(3/5)) any interval contains a rational number that is simpler
than every other rational number in that interval (the simpler
(2/5) lies between (2/7) and (3/5)). Note that 0
(0/1) is the simplest rational of all.
(rationalize (inexact->exact .3) 1/10) => 1/3 ; exact (rationalize .3 1/10) => #i1/3 ; inexact
These procedures are part of every implementation that supports
general
real numbers; they compute the usual transcendental functions.
Log
computes the natural logarithm of z (not the base ten logarithm).
Asin, acos, and atan compute arcsine
, arccosine
, and arctangent
, respectively.
The two-argument variant of atan computes (angle
(make-rectangular x y)) (see below), even in
implementations that don't support general complex numbers.
In general, the mathematical functions log, arcsine, arccosine, and
arctangent are multiply defined.
For nonzero real x, the value of
(log x) is defined to be
the one whose imaginary part lies in the range
-pi (exclusive) to pi (inclusive). (log 0) is
undefined. The value of (log z) when z is complex is
defined according to the formula
(define (log z) (+ (log (magnitude z)) (* +i (angle z))))
With (log) defined this way, the values of arcsin,
arccos, and arctan are according to the following
formulae:
(define (asin z) (* -i (log (+ (* +i z) (sqrt (- 1 (* z z)))))))
(define (acos z) (- (/ pi 2) (asin z)))
(define (atan z) (/ (log (/ (+ 1 (* +i z)) (- 1 (* +i z)))) (* +i 2))
The above specification follows [CLTL], which in turn cites [PENFIELD81]; refer to these sources for more detailed discussion of branch cuts, boundary conditions, and implementation of these functions. When it is possible these procedures produce a real result from a real argument.
Returns the principal square root of z. The result will have either positive real part, or zero real part and non-negative imaginary part.
Returns z1 raised to the power z2:
(define (expt z1 z2) (exp z2 (log z1)))
(expt 0 0) is defined to be equal to 1.
procedure: make-rectangular x1 x2
These procedures are part of every implementation that supports general complex numbers. Suppose x1, x2, x3, and x4 are real numbers and z is a complex number such that
(= z (+ x1 (* +i x2) (* x3 (exp (* +i x4)))))
Then make-rectangular and make-polar return z,
real-part returns x1, imag-part returns x2,
magnitude returns x3, and angle returns x4.
In the case of angle, whose value is not uniquely determined by
the preceding rule, the value returned will be the one in the range
-pi (exclusive) to pi (inclusive).
Rationale: Magnitude is the same as abs for a real argument,
but abs must be present in all implementations, whereas
magnitude need only be present in implementations that support
general complex numbers.
Exact->inexact returns an inexact representation of
z.
The value returned is the
inexact number that is numerically closest to the argument.
If an exact argument has no reasonably close inexact equivalent,
then a violation of an implementation restriction may be reported.
Inexact->exact returns an exact representation of
z. The value returned is the exact number that is numerically
closest to the argument.
If an inexact argument has no reasonably close exact equivalent,
then a violation of an implementation restriction may be reported.
These procedures implement the natural one-to-one correspondence between exact and inexact integers throughout an implementation-dependent range. See section Implementation restrictions.
essential procedure: number->string number
essential procedure: number->string number radix
Radix must be an exact integer, either 2, 8, 10, or 16. If omitted,
radix defaults to 10.
The procedure number->string takes a
number and a radix and returns as a string an external representation of
the given number in the given radix such that
(let ((number number)
(radix radix))
(eqv? number
(string->number (number->string number
radix)
radix)))
is true. It is an error if no possible result makes this expression true.
If number is inexact, the radix is 10, and the above expression can be satisfied by a result that contains a decimal point, then the result contains a decimal point and is expressed using the minimum number of digits (exclusive of exponent and trailing zeroes) needed to make the above expression true [HOWTOPRINT], [HOWTOREAD]; otherwise the format of the result is unspecified.
The result returned by number->string
never contains an explicit radix prefix.
Note: The error case can occur only when number is not a complex number or is a complex number with a non-rational real or imaginary part.
Rationale: If number is an inexact number represented using flonums, and the radix is 10, then the above expression is normally satisfied by a result containing a decimal point. The unspecified case allows for infinities, NaNs, and non-flonum representations.
essential procedure: string->number string
essential procedure: string->number string radix
Returns a number of the maximally precise representation expressed by the
given string. Radix must be an exact integer, either 2, 8, 10,
or 16. If supplied, radix is a default radix that may be overridden
by an explicit radix prefix in string (e.g. "#o177"). If radix
is not supplied, then the default radix is 10. If string is not
a syntactically valid notation for a number, then string->number
returns #f.
(string->number "100") => 100 (string->number "100" 16) => 256 (string->number "1e2") => 100.0 (string->number "15##") => 1500.0
Note: Although string->number is an essential procedure,
an implementation may restrict its domain in the
following ways. String->number is permitted to return
#f whenever string contains an explicit radix prefix.
If all numbers supported by an implementation are real, then
string->number is permitted to return #f whenever
string uses the polar or rectangular notations for complex
numbers. If all numbers are integers, then
string->number may return #f whenever
the fractional notation is used. If all numbers are exact, then
string->number may return #f whenever
an exponent marker or explicit exactness prefix is used, or if
a # appears in place of a digit. If all inexact
numbers are integers, then
string->number may return #f whenever
a decimal point is used.
Characters are objects that represent printed characters such as letters and digits. Characters are written using the notation #\<character> or #\<character name>. For example:
#\a
#\A
#\(
#\
#\space
#\newline
Case is significant in #\<character>, but not in
#\<character name>. If <character> in
#\<character> is alphabetic, then the character
following <character> must be a delimiter character such as a
space or parenthesis. This rule resolves the ambiguous case where, for
example, the sequence of characters "#\space"
could be taken to be either a representation of the space character or a
representation of the character "#\s" followed
by a representation of the symbol "pace."
Characters written in the #\ notation are self-evaluating. That is, they do not have to be quoted in programs.
Some of the procedures that operate on characters ignore the difference
between upper case and lower case. The procedures that ignore case have
"-ci" (for "case insensitive") embedded in their names.
essential procedure: char? obj
Returns #t if obj is a character, otherwise returns #f.
essential procedure: char=? char1 char2
essential procedure: char<? char1 char2
essential procedure: char>? char1 char2
essential procedure: char<=? char1 char2
essential procedure: char>=? char1 char2
These procedures impose a total ordering on the set of characters. It is guaranteed that under this ordering:
(char<? #\A #\B) returns #t.
(char<? #\a #\b) returns #t.
(char<? #\0 #\9) returns #t.
Some implementations may generalize these procedures to take more than two arguments, as with the corresponding numerical predicates.
essential procedure: char-ci=? char1 char2
essential procedure: char-ci<? char1 char2
essential procedure: char-ci>? char1 char2
essential procedure: char-ci<=? char1 char2
essential procedure: char-ci>=? char1 char2
These procedures are similar to char=? et cetera, but they treat
upper case and lower case letters as the same. For example,
(char-ci=? #\A #\a) returns #t.
Some implementations may generalize these procedures to take more than
two arguments, as with the corresponding numerical predicates.
essential procedure: char-alphabetic? char
essential procedure: char-numeric? char
essential procedure: char-whitespace? char
essential procedure: char-upper-case? letter
essential procedure: char-lower-case? letter
These procedures return #t if their arguments are alphabetic,
numeric, whitespace, upper case, or lower case characters, respectively,
otherwise they return #f. The following remarks, which are specific to
the ASCII character set, are intended only as a guide: The alphabetic characters
are the 52 upper and lower case letters. The numeric characters are the
ten decimal digits. The whitespace characters are space, tab, line
feed, form feed, and carriage return.
essential procedure: char->integer char
essential procedure: integer->char n
Given a character, char->integer returns an exact integer
representation of the character. Given an exact integer that is the image of
a character under char->integer, integer->char
returns that character. These procedures implement injective order isomorphisms
between the set of characters under the char<=?
ordering and some subset of the integers under the <=
ordering. That is, if
(char<=? a b) => #t and (<= x y) => #t
and x and y are in the domain of
integer->char, then
(<= (char->integer a)
(char->integer b)) => #t
(char<=? (integer->char x)
(integer->char y)) => #t
essential procedure: char-upcase char
essential procedure: char-downcase char
These procedures return a character char2 such that
(char-ci=? char char2). In addition, if char is
alphabetic, then the result of char-upcase is upper case and the
result of char-downcase is lower case.
With Inlab Scheme strings are conceptionally identical to bytevectors as introduced with the R7RS.
Strings are sequences of characters.
Strings are written as sequences of characters enclosed within doublequotes
("). A doublequote can be written inside a string only by escaping
it with a backslash (\), as in
"The word \"recursion\" has many meanings."
A backslash can be written inside a string only by escaping it with another backslash. Scheme does not specify the effect of a backslash within a string that is not followed by a doublequote or backslash.
A string constant may continue from one line to the next, but the exact contents of such a string are unspecified.
The length of a string is the number of characters that it contains. This number is a non-negative integer that is fixed when the string is created. The valid indexes of a string are the exact non-negative integers less than the length of the string. The first character of a string has index 0, the second has index 1, and so on.
In phrases such as "the characters of string beginning with index start and ending with index end," it is understood that the index start is inclusive and the index end is exclusive. Thus if start and end are the same index, a null substring is referred to, and if start is zero and end is the length of string, then the entire string is referred to.
Some of the procedures that operate on strings ignore the
difference between upper and lower case. The versions that ignore case
have "-ci" (for "case insensitive") embedded in their
names.
essential procedure: string? obj
Returns #t if obj is a string, otherwise returns #f.
essential procedure: make-string k
essential procedure: make-string k char
Make-string returns a newly allocated string of
length k. If char is given, then all elements of the string
are initialized to char, otherwise the contents of the
string are unspecified.
essential procedure: string char ...
Returns a newly allocated string composed of the arguments.
essential procedure: string-length string
Returns the number of characters in the given string.
essential procedure: string-ref string k
k must be a valid index of string.
String-ref returns character k of string using
zero-origin indexing.
essential procedure: string-set! string k char
k must be a valid index of string%, and char must be a character
.
String-set! stores char in element k of string
and returns an unspecified value.
(define (f) (make-string 3 #\*))
(define (g) "***")
(string-set! (f) 0 #\?) => unspecified
(string-set! (g) 0 #\?) => error
(string-set! (symbol->string 'immutable)
0
#\?) => error
essential procedure: string=? string1 string2
essential procedure: string-ci=? string1 string2
Returns #t if the two strings are the same length and contain the same
characters in the same positions, otherwise returns #f.
String-ci=? treats
upper and lower case letters as though they were the same character, but
string=? treats upper and lower case as distinct characters.
essential procedure: string<? string1 string2
essential procedure: string>? string1 string2
essential procedure: string<=? string1 string2
essential procedure: string>=? string1 string2
essential procedure: string-ci<? string1 string2
essential procedure: string-ci>? string1 string2
essential procedure: string-ci<=? string1 string2
essential procedure: string-ci>=? string1 string2
These procedures are the lexicographic extensions to strings of the
corresponding orderings on characters. For example, string<? is
the lexicographic ordering on strings induced by the ordering
char<? on characters. If two strings differ in length but
are the same up to the length of the shorter string, the shorter string
is considered to be lexicographically less than the longer string.
Implementations may generalize these and the string=? and
string-ci=? procedures to take more than two arguments, as with
the corresponding numerical predicates.
essential procedure: substring string start end
String must be a string, and start and end must be exact integers satisfying
(<= 0 start end (string-length string).)
Substring returns a newly allocated string formed from the
characters of
string beginning with index start (inclusive) and ending with index
end (exclusive).
essential procedure: string-append string ...
Returns a newly allocated string whose characters form the concatenation of the given strings.
essential procedure: string->list string
essential procedure: list->string chars
String->list returns a newly allocated list of the
characters that make up the given string. List->string
returns a newly allocated string formed from the characters in the list
chars. String->list and list->string are
inverses so far as equal? is concerned.
Returns a newly allocated copy of the given string.
procedure: string-fill! string char
Stores char in every element of the given string and returns an unspecified value.
Vectors are heterogenous structures whose elements are indexed by integers. A vector typically occupies less space than a list of the same length, and the average time required to access a randomly chosen element is typically less for the vector than for the list.
The length of a vector is the number of elements that it contains. This number is a non-negative integer that is fixed when the vector is created. The valid indexes of a vector are the exact non-negative integers less than the length of the vector. The first element in a vector is indexed by zero, and the last element is indexed by one less than the length of the vector.
Vectors are written using the notation #(obj ...).
For example, a vector of length 3 containing the number zero in element
0, the list (2 2 2 2) in element 1, and the string "Anna" in
element 2 can be written as following:
#(0 (2 2 2 2) "Anna")
Note that this is the external representation of a vector, not an expression evaluating to a vector. Like list constants, vector constants must be quoted:
'#(0 (2 2 2 2) "Anna")
=> #(0 (2 2 2 2) "Anna")
essential procedure: vector? obj
Returns #t if obj is a vector, otherwise returns #f.
essential procedure: make-vector k
Returns a newly allocated vector of k elements. If a second argument is given, then each element is initialized to fill. Otherwise the initial contents of each element is unspecified.
essential procedure: vector obj ...
Returns a newly allocated vector whose elements contain the given
arguments. Analogous to list.
(vector 'a 'b 'c) => #(a b c)
essential procedure: vector-length vector
Returns the number of elements in vector.
essential procedure: vector-ref vector k
k must be a valid index of vector.
Vector-ref returns the contents of element k of
vector.
(vector-ref '#(1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21)
5)
=> 8
(vector-ref '#(1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21)
(inexact->exact
(round (* 2 (acos -1)))))
=> 13
essential procedure: vector-set! vector k obj
k must be a valid index of vector.
Vector-set! stores obj in element k of vector.
The value returned by vector-set! is unspecified.
(let ((vec (vector 0 '(2 2 2 2) "Anna")))
(vector-set! vec 1 '("Sue" "Sue"))
vec)
=> #(0 ("Sue" "Sue") "Anna")
(vector-set! '#(0 1 2) 1 "doe")
=> error ; constant vector
essential procedure: vector->list vector
essential procedure: list->vector list
Vector->list returns a newly allocated list of the objects
contained
in the elements of vector. List->vector returns a newly
created vector initialized to the elements of the list list.
(vector->list '#(dah dah didah))
=> (dah dah didah)
(list->vector '(dididit dah))
=> #(dididit dah)
procedure: vector-fill! vector fill
Stores fill in every element of vector.
The value returned by vector-fill! is unspecified.
This chapter describes various primitive procedures which control the
flow of program execution in special ways.
The procedure? predicate is also described here.
essential procedure: procedure? obj
Returns #t if obj is a procedure, otherwise returns #f.
(procedure? car) => #t
(procedure? 'car) => #f
(procedure? (lambda (x) (* x x)))
=> #t
(procedure? '(lambda (x) (* x x)))
=> #f
(call-with-current-continuation procedure?)
=> #t
essential procedure: apply proc args
procedure: apply proc arg1 ... args
Proc must be a procedure and args must be a list.
The first (essential) form calls proc with the elements of
args as the actual arguments. The second form is a generalization
of the first that calls proc with the elements of the list
(append (list arg1 ...) args) as the actual
arguments.
(apply + (list 3 4)) => 7
(define compose
(lambda (f g)
(lambda args
(f (apply g args)))))
((compose sqrt *) 12 75) => 30
essential procedure: map proc list1 list2 ...
The lists must be lists, and proc must be a
procedure taking as many arguments as there are lists. If more
than one list is given, then they must all be the same length.
Map applies proc element-wise to the elements of the
lists and returns a list of the results, in order from left to right.
The dynamic order in which proc is applied to the elements of the
lists is unspecified.
(map cadr '((a b) (d e) (g h)))
=> (b e h)
(map (lambda (n) (expt n n))
'(1 2 3 4 5))
=> (1 4 27 256 3125)
(map + '(1 2 3) '(4 5 6)) => (5 7 9)
(let ((count 0))
(map (lambda (ignored)
(set! count (+ count 1))
count)
'(a b c))) => unspecified
essential procedure: for-each proc list1 list2 ...
The arguments to for-each are like the arguments to map, but
for-each calls proc for its side effects rather than for
its values. Unlike map, for-each is guaranteed to call
proc on the elements of the lists in order from the first
element to the last, and the value returned by for-each is
unspecified.
(let ((v (make-vector 5)))
(for-each (lambda (i)
(vector-set! v i (* i i)))
'(0 1 2 3 4))
v) => #(0 1 4 9 16)
Forces the value of promise (see section Delayed evaluation).
If no value has been computed for the promise, then a value is computed and returned. The value of the promise is cached (or "memoized") so that if it is forced a second time, the previously computed value is returned.
(force (delay (+ 1 2))) => 3
(let ((p (delay (+ 1 2))))
(list (force p) (force p)))
=> (3 3)
(define a-stream
(letrec ((next
(lambda (n)
(cons n (delay (next (+ n 1)))))))
(next 0)))
(define head car)
(define tail
(lambda (stream) (force (cdr stream))))
(head (tail (tail a-stream)))
=> 2
Force and delay are mainly intended for programs written
in functional style. The following examples should not be considered to
illustrate good programming style, but they illustrate the property that
only one value is computed for a promise, no matter how many times it is
forced.
(define count 0)
(define p
(delay (begin (set! count (+ count 1))
(if (> count x)
count
(force p)))))
(define x 5)
p => a promise
(force p) => 6
p => a promise, still
(begin (set! x 10)
(force p)) => 6
Here is a possible implementation of delay and force.
Promises are implemented here as procedures of no arguments,
and force simply calls its argument:
(define force
(lambda (object)
(object)))
We define the expression
(delay <expression>)
to have the same meaning as the procedure call
(make-promise (lambda () <expression>)),
where make-promise is defined as follows:
(define make-promise
(lambda (proc)
(let ((result-ready? #f)
(result #f))
(lambda ()
(if result-ready?
result
(let ((x (proc)))
(if result-ready?
result
(begin (set! result-ready? #t)
(set! result x)
result))))))))
Rationale: A promise may refer to its own value, as in the last example above.
Forcing such a promise may cause the promise to be forced a second time
before the value of the first force has been computed.
This complicates the definition of make-promise.
Various extensions to this semantics of delay and force
are supported in some implementations:
force on an object that is not a promise may simply
return the object.
#t or to #f,
depending on the implementation:
(eqv? (delay 1) 1) => unspecified (pair? (delay (cons 1 2))) => unspecified
cdr
and +:
(+ (delay (* 3 7)) 13) => 34
essential procedure: call-with-current-continuation proc
Proc must be a procedure of one
argument. The procedure call-with-current-continuation packages
up the current continuation (see the rationale below) as an "escape
procedure"
and passes it as an argument to
proc. The escape procedure is a Scheme procedure of one
argument that, if it is later passed a value, will ignore whatever
continuation is in effect at that later time and will give the value
instead to the continuation that was in effect when the escape procedure
was created.
The escape procedure that is passed to proc has unlimited extent just like any other procedure in Scheme. It may be stored in variables or data structures and may be called as many times as desired.
The following examples show only the most common uses of
call-with-current-continuation. If all real programs were as
simple as these examples, there would be no need for a procedure with
the power of call-with-current-continuation.
(call-with-current-continuation
(lambda (exit)
(for-each (lambda (x)
(if (negative? x)
(exit x)))
'(54 0 37 -3 245 19))
#t)) => -3
(define list-length
(lambda (obj)
(call-with-current-continuation
(lambda (return)
(letrec ((r
(lambda (obj)
(cond ((null? obj) 0)
((pair? obj)
(+ (r (cdr obj)) 1))
(else (return #f))))))
(r obj))))))
(list-length ‘(1 2 3 4)) => 4
(list-length ‘(a b . c)) => #f
Rationale:
A common use of call-with-current-continuation is for
structured, non-local exits from loops or procedure bodies, but in fact
call-with-current-continuation is extremely useful for
implementing a
wide variety of advanced control structures.
Whenever a Scheme expression is evaluated there is a
continuation wanting the result of the expression. The continuation
represents an entire (default) future for the computation. If the expression is
evaluated at top level, for example, then the continuation might take the
result, print it on the screen, prompt for the next input, evaluate it, and
so on forever. Most of the time the continuation includes actions
specified by user code, as in a continuation that will take the result,
multiply it by the value stored in a local variable, add seven, and give
the answer to the top level continuation to be printed. Normally these
ubiquitous continuations are hidden behind the scenes and programmers don't
think much about them. On rare occasions, however, a programmer may
need to deal with continuations explicitly.
Call-with-current-continuation allows Scheme programmers to do
that by creating a procedure that acts just like the current
continuation.
Most programming languages incorporate one or more special-purpose
escape constructs with names like exit, return, or
even goto. In 1965, however, Peter Landin [LANDIN65]
invented a general purpose escape operator called the J-operator. John
Reynolds [REYNOLDS72] described a simpler but equally powerful
construct in 1972. The catch special form described by Sussman
and Steele in the 1975 report on Scheme is exactly the same as
Reynolds's construct, though its name came from a less general construct
in MacLisp. Several Scheme implementors noticed that the full power of the
catch construct could be provided by a procedure instead of by a
special syntactic construct, and the name
call-with-current-continuation was coined in 1982. This name is
descriptive, but opinions differ on the merits of such a long name, and
some people use the name call/cc instead.
Ports represent input and output devices. To Scheme, an input port is a Scheme object that can deliver characters upon command, while an output port is a Scheme object that can accept characters.
essential procedure: call-with-input-file string proc
essential procedure: call-with-output-file string proc
Proc should be a procedure of one argument, and
string should be a string naming a file. For
call-with-input-file, the file must already exist; for
call-with-output-file, the effect is unspecified if the file
already exists. These procedures call proc with one argument: the
port obtained by opening the named file for input or output. If the
file cannot be opened, an error is signalled. If the procedure returns,
then the port is closed automatically and the value yielded by the
procedure is returned. If the procedure does not return, then
the port will not be closed automatically unless it is possible to
prove that the port will never again be used for a read or write
operation.
Rationale: Because Scheme's escape procedures have unlimited extent, it is
possible to escape from the current continuation but later to escape back in.
If implementations were permitted to close the port on any escape from the
current continuation, then it would be impossible to write portable code using
both call-with-current-continuation and
call-with-input-file or call-with-output-file.
essential procedure: input-port? obj
essential procedure: output-port? obj
Returns #t if obj is an input port or output port
respectively, otherwise returns #f.
essential procedure: current-input-port
essential procedure: current-output-port
Returns the current default input or output port.
procedure: with-input-from-file string thunk
procedure: with-output-to-file string thunk
Thunk must be a procedure of no arguments, and
string must be a string naming a file. For
with-input-from-file, the file must already exist; for
with-output-to-file, the effect is unspecified if the file
already
exists. The file is opened for input or output, an input or output port
connected to it is made the default value returned by
current-input-port or current-output-port, and the
thunk is called with no arguments. When the thunk returns,
the port is closed and the previous default is restored.
With-input-from-file and with-output-to-file return the
value yielded by thunk.
If an escape procedure
is used to escape from the continuation of these procedures, their
behavior is implementation dependent.
essential procedure: open-input-file filename
Takes a string naming an existing file and returns an input port capable of delivering characters from the file. If the file cannot be opened, an error is signalled.
essential procedure: open-output-file filename
Takes a string naming an output file to be created and returns an output port capable of writing characters to a new file by that name. If the file cannot be opened, an error is signalled. If a file with the given name already exists, the effect is unspecified.
essential procedure: close-input-port port
essential procedure: close-output-port port
Closes the file associated with port, rendering the port incapable of delivering or accepting characters.
These routines have no effect if the file has already been closed. The value returned is unspecified.
essential procedure: read port
Read converts external representations of Scheme objects into the
objects themselves. That is, it is a parser for the nonterminal
<datum> (see section External representations and
section Pairs and lists). Read returns the next
object parsable from the given input port, updating port to point to
the first character past the end of the external representation of the object.
If an end of file is encountered in the input before any characters are found that can begin an object, then an end of file object is returned. The port remains open, and further attempts to read will also return an end of file object. If an end of file is encountered after the beginning of an object's external representation, but the external representation is incomplete and therefore not parsable, an error is signalled.
The port argument may be omitted, in which case it defaults to the
value returned by current-input-port. It is an error to read
from a closed port.
essential procedure: read-char
essential procedure: read-char port
Returns the next character available from the input port, updating
the port to point to the following character. If no more characters
are available, an end of file object is returned. Port may be
omitted, in which case it defaults to the value returned by
current-input-port.
essential procedure: peek-char
essential procedure: peek-char port
Returns the next character available from the input port,
without updating
the port to point to the following character. If no more characters
are available, an end of file object is returned. Port may be
omitted, in which case it defaults to the value returned by
current-input-port.
Note: The value returned by a call to peek-char is the same as the
value that would have been returned by a call to read-char with
the
same port. The only difference is that the very next call to
read-char or peek-char on that port will return
the
value returned by the preceding call to peek-char. In
particular, a call
to peek-char on an interactive port will hang waiting for input
whenever a call to read-char would have hung.
essential procedure: eof-object? obj
Returns #t if obj is an end of file object, otherwise returns
#f. The precise set of end of file objects will vary among
implementations, but in any case no end of file object will ever be an object
that can be read in using read.
Returns #t if a character is ready on the input port and
returns #f otherwise. If char-ready returns #t
then
the next read-char operation on the given port is
guaranteed
not to hang. If the port is at end of file then
char-ready? returns #t.
Port may be omitted, in which case it defaults to
the value returned by current-input-port.
Rationale: Char-ready? exists to make it possible for a program to
accept characters from interactive ports without getting stuck waiting
for input. Any input editors associated with such ports must ensure
that characters whose existence has been asserted by char-ready?
cannot be rubbed out. If char-ready? were to return #f at
end of file, a port at end of file would be indistinguishable from an
interactive port that has no ready characters.
essential procedure: write obj
essential procedure: write obj port
Writes a written representation of obj to the given port. Strings
that appear in the written representation are enclosed in doublequotes, and
within those strings backslash and doublequote characters are
escaped by backslashes. Write returns an unspecified value. The
port argument may be omitted, in which case it defaults to the value
returned by current-output-port.
essential procedure: display obj
essential procedure: display obj port
Writes a representation of obj to the given port. Strings
that appear in the written representation are not enclosed in
doublequotes, and no characters are escaped within those strings. Character
objects appear in the representation as if written by write-char
instead of by write. Display returns an unspecified
value.
The port argument may be omitted, in which case it defaults to the
value returned by current-output-port.
Rationale: Write is intended
for producing machine-readable output and display is for
producing
human-readable output. Implementations that allow "slashification"
within symbols will probably want write but not display
to
slashify funny characters in symbols.
essential procedure: newline port
Writes an end of line to port. Exactly how this is done differs
from one operating system to another. Returns an unspecified value.
The port argument may be omitted, in which case it defaults to the
value returned by current-output-port.
essential procedure: write-char char
essential procedure: write-char char port
Writes the character char (not an external representation of the
character) to the given port and returns an unspecified value. The
port argument may be omitted, in which case it defaults to the value
returned by current-output-port.
Questions of system interface generally fall outside of the domain of this report. However, the following operations are important enough to deserve description here.
essential procedure: load filename
Filename should be a string naming an existing file
containing Scheme source code. The load procedure reads
expressions and definitions from the file and evaluates them
sequentially. It is unspecified whether the results of the expressions
are printed. The load procedure does not affect the values
returned by current-input-port and current-output-port.
Load returns an unspecified value.
Rationale: For portability, load must operate on source files.
Its operation on other kinds of files necessarily varies among
implementations.
procedure: transcript-on filename
Filename must be a string naming an output file to be
created. The effect of transcript-on is to open the named file
for output, and to cause a transcript of subsequent interaction between
the user and the Scheme system to be written to the file. The
transcript is ended by a call to transcript-off, which closes the
transcript file. Only one transcript may be in progress at any time,
though some implementations may relax this restriction. The values
returned by these procedures are unspecified.